Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Articles
    • 2022
      • Spring 2022
      • Summer 2022
      • Fall 2022
      • Winter 2022
    • 2021
      • Winter 2021
      • Spring 2021
      • Summer 2021
      • Fall 2021
    • 2020
      • Winter 2020
      • Spring 2020
      • Summer 2020
      • Fall 2020
    • 2019
      • Winter 2019
      • Spring 2019
      • Summer 2019
      • Fall 2019
    • 2018
      • Winter 2018
      • Spring 2018
      • Summer 2018
      • Fall 2018
    • 2017
      • Winter 2017
      • Spring 2017
      • Summer 2017
      • Fall 2017
  • Archive
    • 2016
      • Winter 2016
      • Spring 2016
      • Summer 2016
      • Fall 2016
    • 2015
      • Winter 2015
      • Spring 2015
      • Summer 2015
      • Fall 2015
    • 2014
      • Winter 2014
      • Spring 2014
      • Summer 2014
      • Fall 2014
    • 2013
      • Winter 2013
      • Spring 2013
      • Summer 2013
      • Fall 2013
    • 2012
      • Winter 2012
      • Spring 2012
      • Summer 2012
      • Fall 2012
    • 2011
      • Winter 2011
      • Spring 2011
      • Summer 2011
      • Fall 2011
    • 2010
      • Winter 2010
      • Spring 2010
      • Summer 2010
      • Fall 2010
    • 2009
      • Winter 2009
      • Spring 2009
      • Summer 2009
      • Fall 2009
    • 2008
      • Winter 2008
      • Spring 2008
      • Summer 2008
      • Fall 2008
    • 2007
      • Winter 2007
      • Spring 2007
      • Summer 2007
      • Fall 2007
    • 2006
    • 2005
    • 2004
    • 2003
    • 2002
    • 2001
    • 2000
    • 1999
  • Classics
  • Authors
  • Index
  • Contact

The Daystar Journal

Gospel Voices in and for the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod

LCMS Commission on Doctrinal Review

Concordia: A Brief Response to the Decision of the Commission on Doctrinal Review

By Matthew Becker On January 24, 2006 the LCMS Commission on Doctrinal Review revoked the doctrinal certification of Concordia: The Lutheran Confessions “because of numerous passages and features of the volume which are ‘inadequate, misleading, ambiguous, or lacking in doctrinal clarity.’” You can download the full report here. I agree with the CDR’s conclusion that…
Read more →

November 15, 2013

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: The Daystar Journal styled by Verlust Design.